<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://argumente.ro"><title>@rgumente</title><link>http://argumente.ro/strategy</link><description>Romanian blog about business and strategy</description><dc:identifier>http://argumente.ro/strategy</dc:identifier><dc:date>2012-02-05T21:50:09+00:00</dc:date><dc:subject>@rgumente</dc:subject><dc:language>en</dc:language><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li resource="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art0108358123/"/><rdf:li resource="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art2110489872/"/><rdf:li resource="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art6265098438/"/><rdf:li resource="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art6366006012/"/><rdf:li resource="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art8117375382/"/><rdf:li resource="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art8315422408/"/><rdf:li resource="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art1679972177/"/><rdf:li resource="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art2448269358/"/><rdf:li resource="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art6825824163/"/><rdf:li resource="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art3026120982/"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art0108358123/"><title>scale versus features</title><link>http://argumente.ro/strategy/art0108358123/</link><description><![CDATA[Jason has a good post <a href="http://www.calacanis.com/2007/09/05/how-to-have-a-happy-cto-and-ceo-marriage/">pointing</a> some of the main issues that may arise when thinking of going further with the product development. <br><br>The argument leaves from the technical versus strategy guys views on business but fact is that if you, as a business guy, are not capable of understanding the technical issues and challenges from the product development department and thereof not reach a strategy consesus, one of you has to leave. <br>]]></description><dc:date>2007-09-06T08:02:00+00:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Strategy</dc:subject><dc:creator>Dragos</dc:creator></item><item rdf:about="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art2110489872/"><title>tips &amp; tricks for newspapers survival...</title><link>http://argumente.ro/strategy/art2110489872/</link><description><![CDATA[...<a href="http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/070724miller/">in the worldwide web that is</a><br>]]></description><dc:date>2007-07-31T04:12:00+00:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Strategy</dc:subject><dc:creator>Dragos</dc:creator></item><item rdf:about="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art6265098438/"><title>Looking for a exit...</title><link>http://argumente.ro/strategy/art6265098438/</link><description><![CDATA[So you have a product or a service and you're thinking it might be a good fit with Google, Microsoft, Adobe or SAP. <a href="http://www.undertheradarblog.com/wp_blog.html?fb_2042860_anch=2730757">Here</a> are some guidelines for making a play.<br>]]></description><dc:date>2007-07-28T04:14:00+00:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Strategy</dc:subject><dc:creator>Dragos</dc:creator></item><item rdf:about="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art6366006012/"><title>twitter VC financing at a glance</title><link>http://argumente.ro/strategy/art6366006012/</link><description><![CDATA[I must say that I was a bit suprised by <a href="http://www.unionsquareventures.com/2007/07/twitter.html">it</a> - apparently it's about the traction not about the biz model, kinda like delicious' theme investment. <br><br>Now, Fred is a smart guy and has seen lots of things but delicious was solving a problem. I can't seem to understand what problem "microblogging" is solving as of yet, especially given that there is a fair number of substitute products. The upside, which I bet was one of the triggers of the investment, is that there's a fairly large ecosystem built around twitter, and <a href="http://evhead.com">Ev</a>'s also the kind of guy who can gather a significant community around his product. At least he did it with Blogger.<br><br>So I guess the next level challenge is growing that ecosystem and make it attractive for a strategic investor. Quite difficult but not impossible. The chemistry seems right.<br>]]></description><dc:date>2007-07-27T14:21:00+00:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Strategy</dc:subject><dc:creator>Dragos</dc:creator></item><item rdf:about="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art8117375382/"><title>smart move</title><link>http://argumente.ro/strategy/art8117375382/</link><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.convergenceculture.org/weblog/2007/07/reverse_product_placement_the.php">Reversed product placement</a> that is - Fox decided to launch some of the brands from the newly launched The Simpsons movie into the real world, as a 7-Eleven product offering. This move includes (some of the) the entire rebranding of the 7 Eleven stores into Kwik-E Mart.<br>]]></description><dc:date>2007-07-27T13:44:00+00:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Strategy</dc:subject><dc:creator>Dragos</dc:creator></item><item rdf:about="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art8315422408/"><title>Mark Zuckerberg interview...</title><link>http://argumente.ro/strategy/art8315422408/</link><description><![CDATA[...<a href="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1644040,00.html">in Time magazine</a>, I haven't seen too many interviews with him actually. We're not focused on the exit, be it a strategic investor or an IPO, we're just trying to build a useful product, with more international exposure. We call it a social utility. <br>]]></description><dc:date>2007-07-25T04:56:00+00:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Strategy</dc:subject><dc:creator>Dragos</dc:creator></item><item rdf:about="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art1679972177/"><title>reality check</title><link>http://argumente.ro/strategy/art1679972177/</link><description><![CDATA[In business it's not about you, it's about them, the customers. Though it is not always applicable <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2007/07/empathy.html">when it comes to blogs</a> - I read a blog because I am interested what its author has to say about a certain issue or perspective.<br>]]></description><dc:date>2007-07-24T07:17:00+00:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Strategy</dc:subject><dc:creator>Dragos</dc:creator></item><item rdf:about="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art2448269358/"><title>the graph of the day</title><link>http://argumente.ro/strategy/art2448269358/</link><description><![CDATA[<img src="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art2448269358/Picture%202.png"><br><br>from a Bear Stern report about the impact of (video) UGC content on the big media companies - <a href="http://www.bearstearns.com/bservlet/BSFile?filePath=I60QwqJMFL0MFhHqI8HkYegbHVSVCr%2bWe4EAYKWikL5LWp6KzJC2Sg%3d%3d&amp;preview=yes">pdf</a><br>]]></description><dc:date>2007-07-22T07:52:00+00:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Strategy</dc:subject><dc:creator>Dragos</dc:creator></item><item rdf:about="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art6825824163/"><title>pegasus going to the next level</title><link>http://argumente.ro/strategy/art6825824163/</link><description><![CDATA[remember <a href="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art7373542071">this</a>? - here's <a href="http://www.pegasusnews.com/blogs/pegasusnewsblog/2007/jul/17/fisher/">some update</a><br>]]></description><dc:date>2007-07-22T07:49:00+00:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Strategy</dc:subject><dc:creator>Dragos</dc:creator></item><item rdf:about="http://argumente.ro/strategy/art3026120982/"><title>quote of the day</title><link>http://argumente.ro/strategy/art3026120982/</link><description><![CDATA[<i>There is a very, very thin dividing line between survival and failure. You've just got to fight and fight and fight and fight to survive.<br><br></i>from a last year <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/business2_archive/2006/08/01/8382250/index.htm">interview</a> with Richard Branson<br>]]></description><dc:date>2007-07-20T04:02:00+00:00</dc:date><dc:subject>Strategy</dc:subject><dc:creator>Dragos</dc:creator></item></rdf:RDF>
