Silviu made a very good comment of the present situation in Romania as a result of the elections and also I got several emails with comments - thank you for that, I was actually surprised that so many people cared to share their thoughts on this.
Of course it is not that bad - I mean it could definitely be worse. :)
It's not that I had high expectations but still I would have thought that it would be a head-to-head race. The partials as of 5 o'clock indicate a 36%/31% ratio PSD/DA and 40.2%/33.9% for Nastase/Basescu counted from 68% of the voting sections.
Moreover, I knew and read from several sources about muddy moves from the PSD for getting a false start since they were handling the bread and butter. I even mentioned about it on this blog. I just didnot expect that the percentage accounting for that would be that high - and that is my big disappointment - this means the perpetuation of a mediocre environment that forces you to create innovative solutions for staying on top of the game (or of the system) rather than being preoccupied with the (theoretical) purpose of the whole exercise - the best possible choice for value creation in the strict law-obeying and economical sense. While making a better system of course.
On a related note I was reading somewhere (I think it was a BBC source) that Basescu actually declared that the frauds (or should I rather call them anomalies?) would count for 5-7%, and that morally the D.A. won. That's just a pale figure of speech - at the end of the day the numbers are the only things counting, and besides I doubt that they would be as high as claimed. Also, I didnot expect that the undecided number was that high - for various reasons 4 people out of 10 said that it's not worth getting involved, and that saddens me, I think it is a big number.
Basically now either PSD or DA will have to ally with either PRM or UDMR for getting the majority and this means inconsistency and compromise - I doubt it'd last for more than a year. Also, word in town is that DA is going to get consolidated by a merger between its constituents PD and PNL - this certainly will have big impact a la long and needs to be followed closely.*
I certainly agree with Silviu on the corruption thing - there is not a magic wand that anybody coming in place would be able to use for erradicating it in less that 3-5 years. And here it is what I am mostly concerned of - exactly the change and its pace. By having this Parliament structure IMO we have the premises for the slowest rate of changing things and that would mainly come from an external source - being pushed from behind by EU. Btw, I am not sure you are aware about the way the EU chapters were negotiated - the Romanian part basically had no objections and signed everything as it had the time pressure of the upcoming elections - and that would heavily impact the economy in 2007 or whenever we would be formally accepted. And at that time any party that would be in power will be taxed as a consequence - perhaps that would be DA's bright side for not getting the majority yesterday. :)
Also the flat tax would have been perfectly welcome in this economic boom context as it would be a great incentive for more entrepreneurial ventures in a country with not so much experience in this sense.
Finally a legit concern would be - is the Romanian society as whole ready for a big & fast change? The demographics show us that probably not - and again I agree with Silviu that the older generation was the most dilligent part exercising their pro-PSD vote and implicitly their risk aversion and fear of big and radical change. Sadly enough we still need to wait for younger generations to emerge for a counterweight.
*For people not familiar with the Romanian political scene DA is an alliance between the liberals (PNL) and the democrats (PD). UDMR is the party of the Hungarian minorities which counted for about 8% of the votes and PRM is the extremist party of a former Ceausescu's poet having become a politician at the 1989 system swing. PRM got about 11% of the votes. PSD+PUR (which for simplicity I simply called it PSD) is an alliance between the governmental party and a small other one whose president owns an influential Romanian media empire (hence the alliance interest from PSD :))
UPDATE: Via Daniel here is a good international roundup of what others think on the whole thing.
Also Doug has a good coverage explaining in detail the potential choices that the main political players from the Parliament would have to consider as next steps.